New Blood Test Could Determine If Infections Are Bacterial Or Viral
CBS Pittsburgh (con't)
Affordable Care Act Updates: CBSPittsburgh.com/ACA
Health News & Information: CBSPittsburgh.com/Health
PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — A new blood test may one day be able to tell whether an infection is bacterial or viral.
It’s important because it may help cut down on the over-prescription of antibiotics which has led to bacteria-resistant superbugs.
Researchers at Duke Medicine have developed a test that could drastically cut down on the over-prescription of antibiotics.
Using a blood sample, they can tell whether a person’s respiratory illness is viral or bacterial.
“This test could nine times out of 10 tell you if this patient had a viral infection or if they did not,” said Dr. Aimee Zaas, of Duke Medicine.
While bacterial infections can be treated with antibiotics, viral infections – like a cold – cannot.
The two kinds of illnesses are hard to distinguish, so Dr. Zaas’s team focused on how the body’s immune system reacts.
“This particular test identifies how the body’s white blood cells respond to infection and actually looks for genes that are relatively specific to viral infection,” said Dr. Zaas.
Using antibiotics when you don’t need them is a big problem because the bacteria can become resistant to the drug.
The CDC says last year 23,000 Americans died from resistant bacterial infections.
The Duke blood test still has to undergo more study and researchers want to make it faster. Right now it takes 12 hours to get results.
Doctors say it needs to be under an hour for it to be useful.
Federal health officials say at least two million people in the United States become infected with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics each year.