New Pension Rescue Plan Means Higher Parking Rates

By Jon Delano, KDKA Political Editor

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — As the clock ticks down to midnight on Friday when the state takes over the city’s pension fund, some members of city council tried a last ditch effort to avoid that takeover.

“This plan meets the mayor’s criteria to create no new debt, receives commitment to work with the unions involved and assures a plan of success,” Council President Darlene Harris said Tuesday.

She was joined at a morning press conference by City Controller Michael Lamb and a majority of council members, who unveiled a plan that, they say, state pension officials have signed off on.

The idea is to commit the revenue from higher parking rates and meters directly into the city pension’s fund.

“If we were to dedicate revenue whether it be parking revenue or any other revenue to the pension fund over a term of years, could we add up that value and then discount it back to a present value calculation,” said Lamb.

Lamb says higher parking and meter rates for the next 30 years dedicated to the city pension fund would substitute for that $220 million up-front payment the state requires to avoid a takeover.

“There’s nobody who is making money off of it, there is no interest to be paid. This is the least expensive plan for the people of Pittsburgh,” noted City Council Finance Chair Bill Peduto.

Proponents say that is because it avoids the higher taxes that might be likely under a state takeover, but since it involves the Parking Authority raising garage rates, Mayor Ravenstahl must sign off too.

“Now with the controller behind it, all of council behind it, the ICA behind it, the state behind, there is just one person who needs to get behind it.”

The mayor controls the Parking Authority, and the latest plan requires rate hikes.

The public will feel the plan — the $2 an hour downtown meter rate will go up to $3 while rates in neighboring business districts rise to $1 or $2 an hour.

As for city parking garages, rates will go up, but less than the private garages.

Council members called on the mayor to work with them to prevent a state takeover.

“Every effort that we undertake in order to rectify this pension situation needs to be a cooperative effort between the mayor and city council, and this is no different,” said Councilwoman Natalia Rudiak, a member of the Parking Authority.

Late Tuesday afternoon, in a surprise move, the mayor seemed to agree.

“I don’t want to be an obstructionist at this point, not knowing that this is a plan that they think will work. I hope they’re right. I don’t think they are, but I hope that they are,” said Ravenstahl at a late afternoon press conference.

While Ravenstahl criticized the latest council-controller plan as unworkable and costly to those who park, he said he would not veto it.

“It is severely if not critically flawed, as I have said, so I won’t sign the legislation, but I will not veto it,” Ravenstahl said.


One Comment

  1. redrock100 says:

    raise taxes on city residents. problem solved.

  2. gio bonnanno says:

    think about this. Who goes downtown to shop anymore? Do you think raising parking rates are going to make it more attactive? The parking rates will ne absorbed by NON city residents who work in the city,spend money in the city,and energize the city streets daily. The unions should be proud to be part of the demise ,the wilting of a beautiful city. I’m really wondering how anyone can actually buy a 300-400 $ condo and pay more to park than taxes.

  3. Gary says:

    lets cut city council down to four members that should free up some money to put into the pension fund

  4. lorenzo says:

    Remember all you liberal progressives, union people, teachers and such…NEVER CUT TAXES JUST FIND MORE MONEY. I went to Pittsburgh once this year and will never go back..Traffic and roads torn up, no parking on the street, THE JUICE ISN’T WORTH THE SQUEEZE!!


  5. Kathleen says:

    Last time I went to the city Strip District, received a $55.00 parking ticket on a Saturday. They were very busy ticketing cars, & chasing customers away.
    Make sure the party boy mayor keeps his bodyguards.

  6. bird says:

    Hey Lorenzo, thank the unions for what you have. Yuppies like you never had to get their hands dirty anyway. The city is garbage. I hope for bankruptcy. I don’t use the city for anything.

  7. jp says:

    kathleen your an idot… threats? really? pay your 55.00 parking ticket and move on.. they should have towed your drunk butt

  8. jp says:

    how bout randell give some of that PAT money he finds all the time.. and help the city of pittsburgh with there finances first… then worry about port authority last… Thats the big pittsburgh problem.!

  9. JC says:

    at the price of city parking, I will have my fun in the suburbs. ..good luck since you are being stupid in bitting (i.e. taxing) the hand that has been feeding you.

Comments are closed.

More From CBS Pittsburgh

Play It
Get The All New CBS Local App

Watch & Listen LIVE