While to many who read my post comment on Saturday believe that Joe Paterno’s silence is morally reprehensible and unacceptable, silence on the part of those that are directly or indirectly aware of an abusers activities is nothing new and points to a much larger issue relative to prevention as much as it does accountability . . . http://wp.me/pydAP-2Hz

Good thing Jack had the right opinion on this or he would have been fired too like Franco. Ah life in OBAMAMERICA in 2011.

In America people are innocent until proven guilty. Sandusky has been charged only by a grand jury, has had no hearing, has certainly had no trial, and all the cited allegations in the indictment that are serious have major holes in them like victims for the two alleged statutory rape cases, for inexplicable and confused reports of conduct by people involved in one case which people are now remarking, and in the other case the one supposed witness is not able to testify from dementia too severe to let him testify. And now Mayor Ravenstahl wants Harris to resign because he said nice things about Paterno? Who even this flawed indictment praised? Hmmn, wasn’t it Franco’s kid who dared to run vs. Ravenstahl last election as an independent? Jack you are wrong in this one. For both people. Sandusky is innocent and Paterno is blameless. Until a trail occurs.